by MHM
19 October 2018
19 October 2018
The threat of an electromagnetic pulse attack
by a nuclear armed adversary is certainly a possibility (however remote), and we
should not forget that a similar phenomena, called a coronal mass ejection,
occurs naturally and has hit earth many times in the past. Most recently, the
so-called Carrington event was recorded in 1859, and a geomagnetic storm occurred
in 1989 damaging power generators and causing a nine hour outage in Montreal, Canada and the province of Quebec.
While an exoatmospheric nuclear burst (or
bursts) would cause serious damage to the electrical infrastructure of industrialized nations, many areas around the world would not
be affected and life would continue pretty much as it has for the past hundred
years (if you’re into third world living standards). For those of us living in
the “civilized world”, it’s an entirely different matter.
In 1962, US nuclear tests confirmed that detonations in space caused an electromagnetic phenomena that could travel hundreds of miles and damage electrical equipment. The USSR also discovered this aspect of nuclear warfare, and implemented it into their war plans.
Declassified US government documents show beyond a reasonable doubt that a high altitude burst does not require a multi-megaton yield weapon to cause a substantial EMP effect. However, device construction and materials must be specifically configured to provide the necessary output. I won’t go into specific details on how this is achieved, only to say that the technology is not beyond any nuclear weapons state (to include North Korea).
On 22 October 1962, the Soviets conducted a series of effects tests which included the detonation of a 300 kiloton warhead at the height of 180 miles (Test 184). The EMP effects were quite severe, with damage to electrical equipment out to 621 miles from the space burst point.
In 1962, US nuclear tests confirmed that detonations in space caused an electromagnetic phenomena that could travel hundreds of miles and damage electrical equipment. The USSR also discovered this aspect of nuclear warfare, and implemented it into their war plans.
Declassified US government documents show beyond a reasonable doubt that a high altitude burst does not require a multi-megaton yield weapon to cause a substantial EMP effect. However, device construction and materials must be specifically configured to provide the necessary output. I won’t go into specific details on how this is achieved, only to say that the technology is not beyond any nuclear weapons state (to include North Korea).
On 22 October 1962, the Soviets conducted a series of effects tests which included the detonation of a 300 kiloton warhead at the height of 180 miles (Test 184). The EMP effects were quite severe, with damage to electrical equipment out to 621 miles from the space burst point.
US data has shown that not every piece
of electrical equipment will be permanently damaged; much depends on the type
of equipment and level of shielding. During one 1998 lab test, several home
computers were permanently damaged, while others showed no damage even with
exposures to 32kv/m (“Final Report on Computer Test Data”, US Army Nuclear and Chemical Agency, 23 Oct
1998). Thus, there are numerous factors involved with an EMP effect, but for
anyone concerned with such an event, basic steps must be taken to protect
vehicles, communications equipment, generators, etc.
Theorized graphic of a EMP burst over the US.
Note how the fields vary in the distribution of volts per meter.
The Carrington Event
Quite similar to an EMP, a coronal mass
ejection is a serious space weather event which has a potential for world wide
impact. Earth narrowly missed such a CME
in July 2012 by only seven days, some scientists conclude that the event exceeded
the power of the so called Carrington event of September 1859.
Thus, while the threat of a nuclear EMP burst remains a concern, a more likely scenario for near societal collapse would be a Carrington type event.
Old School Survival (OSS) blog
Copyright 2018 by Michael H. Maggelet
Old School Survival (OSS) blog
Copyright 2018 by Michael H. Maggelet
Further study-
1. NASA.gov video on Coronal Mass Ejections
2. An excellent technical writeup of USSR EMP tests-
"Soviet Test 184- The 1962 Soviet Nuclear EMP Tests Over Kazakhstan" by Jerry Emanuelson, Future Science LLC.
"Soviet Test 184- The 1962 Soviet Nuclear EMP Tests Over Kazakhstan" by Jerry Emanuelson, Future Science LLC.
http://futurescience.com/emp/test184.html
3. Glasstone blogspot, another tech writeup, full of details-
https://glasstone.blogspot.com/2006/03/emp-radiation-from-nuclear-space.html
3. Glasstone blogspot, another tech writeup, full of details-
https://glasstone.blogspot.com/2006/03/emp-radiation-from-nuclear-space.html
4. NOAA/NWS Space Weather Prediction Center
https://www.swpc.noaa.gov/
https://www.swpc.noaa.gov/
No comments:
Post a Comment